Bitcoin was forged to be on fire In a hostile environment, but let’s be completely clear: stay alive and prosperous They are two different things. Only because bitcoin He can Steadfastness Want This hostility, and does not mean that we should not do everything possible to enhance a favorable environment that speeds up adopting. The belief otherwise is a bad reading of basic morals. Bitcoin’s brilliance is that it is still without permission or centralization regardless from It fights it-but this does not prevent us from working to ensure that we have the most useful conditions for its long-term success.
In fact, general policy responses to organizational and legislative inquiries were constantly Reaffirmation These basics: Bitcoin strength is open source, secondary programs, and a wide distribution of mining and knots. In other words, it is not about selling. It comes to ensuring that our governments understand the benefits of Bitcoin open design.
There is a difference between “Bitcoin designed for an enemy environment” and “We must Want Adexual environment. “Owning the architecture resistant to opponents does not require sitting and ignoring opportunities to reduce friction, whether in energy policy or user daily.
The hostility may slow the adoption, push development abroad, or to intimidate ordinary users who are not ready for this level of conflict. Meanwhile, the measurable participation with policy makers can prevent the concession banning, organizing a balanced shape, and providing legitimate paths for institutional capital to flow in –everyone Which can accelerate the global use of Bitcoin. It is not a betrayal of Satoshi’s vision to say, “We would like to flourish Bitcoin under transparent and fair laws.” We want people to choose Bitcoin, and they are not forced to do so through some catastrophic collapse of the old regime.
There is nothing “UNBITCOIN” about encouraging legislation that protects the rights of individuals in using their BTC and keeping them, or that supports open source development. We must be unusually active in these political arenas, because ignoring them will not make them disappear. It will only be allowed to others – perhaps with very Various agendas-for the appointment of rules in ways to obey privacy, obstruct self-need, or obstruct innovation.
The key remains vigilant against settlements that undermine the integrity of the protocol. Building relations with politicians or organizers does not mean that we are pleading with favorable sculpting points at the expense of resistance to censorship. This simply means that we hear our voices. If we see required to force the changes at the level of anti -user protocol, this is the place where we must stand firmly and say “no” for practical and ideological reasons. But participating proactively in how Bitcoin mining can settle power networks or how Lightning can provide semi -fixed payments no Bitcoin ethics privilege. It is part of a rational strategy to help the public and policy makers understand the true value of Bitcoin.
Farmed concerns about large mining processes that are not intended for organizational pressure are not new. The truth is that Bitcoin’s design remains resistant to opponent: anyone Can I have if they have devices and energy, and anyone A full knot can be run to apply the rules, ensuring that there is no single mine agent to change the protocol. If some mining pools bend to monitoring requirements, other gatherings will be attracted by fees to include these transactions. This is exactly how Bitcoin was designed: guidance about censorship with calm, decentralized architectural engineering.
Ironically, positive organizational participation can Reduce Central risks if you open more states, countries and smaller energy providers to host mining facilities. The diversity of geography and jurisdiction means that no one entity or government can impose comprehensive rules on the entire network. Again, “the survival of the hostile environment” does not mean that it is far from pragmatic solutions that help in the insecurity of retail.
It is true that privacy, expansion and accessibility are still urgent challenges. This is not either/or a suggestion: we can both of them Communicating with the organizers to avoid the infinite policy and Focus on providing privacy and scaling solutions. The key is not to allow the daily policy to be distressed in the work that must be done on the techniques of the second layer such as the lightning network or easy -to -use privacy solutions.
The developers are actively addressing these issues, from better encryption to the most easier lightning portfolios. We must defend-collectively and political-which maintains the self-body in the foreground and maintains the third-party trustees optional. Spreading knowledge with “not your keys, not your currencies” at the legislative level, is not sold; It ensures that more people (including politicians) actually realize the main causes of bitcoin.
It is easy to look at the ecosystem – full of companies ’players, pressure efforts, and social media plays – and it is believed to have lost his soul. But Bitcoin has always been full of various sounds, many of which are interested in profit in the short term. This was true in 2011, that was true during the wars of the size of the mass, and that’s right now. Bitcoin did not destroy. The main durability of the network guarantees that if you want to keep your own keys and check your transactions,, No one can prevent you.
The central promise of Bitcoin did not evaporate, nor should it mean to participate in the policy surrender. It is simply another stage in the development of Bitcoin, where we form a better technology environment actively and People who benefit from it. We must embrace that fighting with sincerity, defending the basics of Bitcoin, and continuing to build in the future where digital-resistant digital funds are, and leadership is the global rule-and not just an emergency plan for hostile circumstances.
This is a guest post by Pierre Rohard. The opinions that are expressed are completely property and do not necessarily reflect the views of BTC Inc or Magazine Bitcoin.