While bitcoin’s impact on the environment has been discussed at length over the past couple of years, the latest AI software trend is now under fire for its carbon footprint. According to many headlines and academic papers this year, AI consumes a great deal of electricity and uses copious amounts of water to cool data centers.
Reports insist that AI and Chatgpt consume a ton of electricity and water
Recently, environmentalists have directed their targets towards different technologies, and over the past 24 months, a great deal of focus has been directed at bitcoin mining. Now, the insatiable drive to reduce the carbon footprint is taking aim at the artificial intelligence (AI) trend that is revolutionizing the world. There is no doubt that AI will be very popular in 2023, launching Openai’s Chatgpt and other innovative new software. However, many scientific articles and papers claim that AI consumes a huge amount of energy and has a large carbon footprint.
according to a report As published by Bloomberg, “Artificial intelligence uses more energy than other forms of computing.” The article uses a tactic used by members of the media to make it look like machines are taking energy from humans. Bloomberg authors Josh Saul and Dina Bass insist that “training a single (AI) model could eat up more electricity than 100 American homes use in an entire year.” The report further notes that while the researchers estimated total About how much energy it takes to create an AI model, there is no total estimate of the total amount of energy the technology uses.
Meanwhile, A.J Academic paper Posted by students from the University of Colorado Riverside and the University of Texas Arlington, they claim that Chatgpt not only uses a lot of electricity, but it also makes use of water to cool data centers. The paper reports that tech giant Microsoft uses so much water to cool its AI facilities in the US that it can be used for “370 BMWs or 320 Tesla electric cars.” The paper also claims that training the GPT-3 model used 185,000 gallons of water.
Mark Lapp, author at techtarget.com, Insists that “large data centers and AI models use massive amounts of energy and harm the environment.” last condition of numenta.com also insists that artificial intelligence is “harming” the planet, and the author claims that this trend could accelerate the climate crisis if not dealt with. Not everyone agrees with the alarming studies and headlines, with many believing the so-called climate crisis to be a lie. For example, a a report Published by the Gatestone Institute Claims climate warning is harmful to the West.
“Future generations will judge us harshly for allowing extreme environmental activism to weaken us in the West,” explains Drew Godifredi, an author at the Gatestone Institute. Meteorologist John Xiuchuk insists the climate threat is a scam. “Climate Fraud Warning is not a substitute for data,” Xuychuk chirp On April 16 “Our primate ancestors evolved when temperatures were about 20 degrees Fahrenheit higher than they are today – and there were no polar ice caps. The Earth is now relatively cold – and climatically getting colder.”
From Bitcoin to AI to rice farming – climate activists insist on settling science
Additionally, climate alerters are not content with bitcoin mining and artificial intelligence. A recent report by Agence France-Presse (AFP) has been criticized for blaming rice farming for large carbon dioxide emissions. “Scientists say that if the world wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, rice cannot be ignored,” AFP report He says. Several individuals criticized an AFP tweet on Sunday for reporting that rice cultivation causes carbon dioxide emissions. “What cannot be ignored is the fact that rice is literally the best source of food for billions of people,” one person said answered to the AFP Twitter account. “Eliminating rice would starve millions of people…and some people like you (AFP) are good at it.”
The US representative for Kentucky’s 4th congressional district, Thomas Massey, also criticized the video tweet posted by AFP. “The fact that climate is getting up chasing rice just shows you how irrational they are,” Massey He said. “Mature forests release large amounts of methane. Ponds and lakes release methane. The decomposition of organic matter in the absence of oxygen (or in the guts of herbivores and termites) releases methane.” The truth is that people now believe that subjective assessments and arbitrary opinions of what is and is not good for the planet should be investigated and regulated.
While bitcoin provides economic freedom as a censorship-resistant currency, some argue that climate change concerns must also be addressed. Just like bitcoin, the environmental impact of AI and rice farming is also under scrutiny. While many follow the rules and regulations set by climate change experts and bureaucrats, others embrace it Conflicting opinions And they argue The flag is not settled.
What are your thoughts on the environmental impact of AI models and how do they compare to the criticism against bitcoin mining? Share your thoughts on this topic in the comments section below.
Image credits: shutterstock, pixabay, wikicommons
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services or companies. Bitcoin.com It does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the Company nor the author shall be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.