This article is also available in Spanish.
Ripple Labs is approaching a pivotal turning point with a potential initial public offering (IPO), a development that has been speculated for some time. An IPO can be a transformative moment reminiscent of Amazon.com Inc.’s initial public offering (IPO) in 1997. Jake Claver, a Qualified Family Office Professional (QFOP), explains this perspective in a string On the
According to Claver, the company has strengthened its position within the blockchain ecosystem with its robust cross-border payment solutions, which currently support more than 300 financial institutions around the world. The company’s use of XRP allows for significantly faster and more cost-effective transactions compared to those processed via the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) network. “This positions Ripple as a faster and more transparent SWIFT 2.0,” Claver asserts.
Despite these achievements, Ripple has weathered significant challenges, most notably its legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). However, recent court rulings have favored Ripple, which could pave the way for bigger opportunities, including a public offering. Claver points out that “recent court rulings in favor of Ripple could open doors to greater opportunities, such as going public.”
Why did Ripple become like Amazon in 1997?
Paralleling Amazon’s development, Claver noted, “Just as Amazon was known as an online bookstore before its IPO, Ripple is known for its blockchain solutions. But there is potential for much more than that.” He further explained: “When Amazon went public, it raised $54 million, which enabled it to expand into new markets.” Ripple is also expected to open up huge potential growth opportunities through a public listing.
Related reading
Ripple’s strategic acquisitions, including Metaco – now renamed Ripple Custody – demonstrate its intent to expand its market presence. “With acquisitions like Metaco, which is now known as Ripple Custody, they are already showing interest in expanding their reach,” Klaver says. “This may be just the beginning.”
The potential implications of Ripple choosing an initial public offering (IPO) or direct listing are multifaceted. Claver explains that the IPO will provide Ripple with new capital, enabling rapid expansion and entry into new markets such as tokenized securities, real assets (RWAs), and decentralized finance (DeFi). “The IPO will provide Ripple with new capital, enabling it to expand quickly and enter new markets such as tokenized securities, RWAs or DeFi,” he says.
Furthermore, the influx of capital from an IPO could facilitate further acquisitions, allowing the company to expand its offerings and enhance its portfolio. Claver made a direct comparison to Amazon’s acquisitions, noting that “Ripple could use IPO funds to acquire other companies and expand its offerings. Similar to Amazon’s acquisitions of Whole Foods and Twitch, Ripple could break into new markets and strengthen its portfolio.”
Improved financial resources would also enable Ripple to accelerate its research and development efforts. “More resources will allow Ripple to accelerate R&D, improve the XRP Ledger, and explore new applications such as smart contracts, tokenized real assets, and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs),” Claver explains.
Related reading
Claver differentiates between the two basic routes to going public: IPO and direct listing. He explained: “An IPO involves issuing new shares to raise capital, which are usually guaranteed by investment banks, but come with costs such as underwriting fees and regulatory requirements. In contrast, a direct listing does not involve issuing new shares; instead, Existing shareholders sell their shares on the market. This method is generally less expensive and faster than an initial public offering.
Given Ripple’s strong financial position, with cash reserves of more than $1.3 billion, Claver notes that a direct listing could be a viable option. “Ripple could opt for a direct listing because it already has a strong balance sheet,” he says. “A direct listing provides transparency and avoids the lock-in periods that restrict insider sales in a traditional IPO.”
Beyond the financial mechanisms, Claver emphasizes that going public is a force to legitimize Ripple. He compares Amazon’s IPO, saying: “Amazon’s IPO has legitimized e-commerce. For Ripple, a public listing would legitimize its role in global finance, signaling to banks and regulators that it is there.” To stay.
Recent favorable legal rulings in Ripple v. SEC have significantly strengthened its position, making the prospect of a public listing more feasible. “Ripple is at a critical juncture, just like Amazon was before its initial public offering in 1997,” Claver concludes. “If Ripple follows a similar path, we may see the rise of a new tech giant. Whether through an IPO or a direct listing, this move could open up The door to significant growth for Ripple and the blockchain industry.”
At press time, XRP was trading at $0.5478.
Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com