On a common topic on X, Justin Bons – founder and chief investment official in Cyber Capital, a box that describes it as the oldest encoded currency fund in Europe – defines a pointed criticism of Solana Blockchain. he Accuse Solana is a suffering from many defects, including the frequent current of the network, and the centralization of pressure through the requirements of the required devices, and what it considers an unspecified model that sacrifices reliability of speed.
Solana has defects, but she is still leading
Bons admitted that Solana showed improvements over time – especially in treating power outages – stressed that Blockchains should not decrease, even in the experimental stages. He drew attention to the direction of “important congestion events” resulting from scheduling the network and problems related to the Quic protocol Also emphasized that sandwiches and mev (extractable value) remain an “unlimited problem”.
Bons described the requirements of Solana devices as a particularly exhaust With more than 1400 sincerity.
He criticized what he considered the “broken local fees market” leading to the deteriorating user experiences, but he expressed optimism that these problems will be solved this year. Regarding the unlimited Solana design, Bons has argued that it creates “less than 1 % of TX failure”, but described it as structural inefficiency and waste. He also asked about the Solana Foundation’s sponsorship by the Solana Foundation, noting that although it was valuable during the initial growth of Solana, “it’s time when it is stopped … Sol can stand on its own now.”
Nevertheless, Bons explained that he moved from being critical to a “supporter”, confirming, “Sol is Blockchain without permission and decentralization enough … BTC & ETH cannot provide this service on a large scale. This is the reason for Sol deals with their lunch and while carrying it on the CypherPUNK flame.
The notes led to a direct response from the developer of the Solana Joao Mendona community, which highlighted that the repeated Blockchain pursuit of performance sometimes leads to almost shattered challenges. “Solana is paying all the boundaries known to this industry … still has a time time> 99.9 % with a more than a year record of not stopping the production of the mass.”
He believes that the additional “accidents” sometimes remain possible so that the network has many program customers – at the present time, the majority of medicines work on one customer – stressed that Solana continued to develop. Mindonça also dealt with the perceived central, stressing that high devices requirements do not necessarily hinder the ability of users to run the contract to verify.
According to him, knot configurations can be stripped into more modest requirements for those who only need to track the chain, which reduces barriers in front of the wider participation. He pointed out that all the main Blockains employs similar incentives for the Solana Corporation’s sponsorship program in order to help obtain the validation networks of Bootstrap, noting that the Deving Foundation Solana (SFDP) has already decreased from about 20 % to about 12 % of the total share.
Bons answered by emphasizing that although multiple customers may actually reduce the time of the network’s disruption in the future, such interruptions should not be exempt. He also repeated the emphasis on Solana’s unlimited approach, on the pretext that it leads to a “optimistic model instead of an inevitable system”, and he believes it reduces the reliability of transactions.
Mendonça pushed back by noting that the design of Solana “gives priority to the user’s speed, pain for the developer … only how it should be”, and that stopping the system prevents the corruption of the potential situation when major problems appear, at least so that many customers can secure Repeat the network.
At the time of the press, Sol was traded at $ 192.
Distinctive photo of Shutterstock, Chart from TradingView.com
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.