Opinion: Sergej Kunz, co -founder of 1inch
Founding players were closely watching decentralized financing growth. Defi platforms are safe and compatible is the only solution to build confidence and attract more institutions.
The clear water attracts large ships
During the past four years, DEFI Institutional Adoption It has passed from 10 % of hedge boxes to 47 %, and is expected to rise to 65 % in 2025. Goldman Sachs reaches their arms to distort the issuance of bonds and agriculture.
The first adoption is already adopting themselves in the financing of Onchain, including VISA, which has been processed more than a billion dollars in encryption transactions since 2021 and it is now Test Border payments. In the next two years, institutional adoption will accelerate. The compatible organizational framework that maintains the basic advantages of Defi is necessary for institutional adoption to participate with confidence.
Davi's institutional trilogy
It is not a secret that many Defi security exploits occur every year. The last BYBIT penetration of a $ 1.4 billion loss. The breach occurred through a transfer operation that was vulnerable to the attack. Such attacks raise concerns about multi -neglect and blind sign. This happens when users agree to transactions without complete details, which makes the blind signature significant risks. This condition requires stronger security measures and improvements in the user experience.
The threats of theft due to the weaknesses in smart contracts or errors by auditors make institutional investors hesitate to deposit large sums of money in institutions complexes. Institutions are also at risk of not compliance with the lack of clear regulatory frameworks, which creates a frequency in entering the area. The DEFI user interface is often designed for users with technical experience. Founding investors need easy -to -use experiences that make Defi exist without relying on third -party brokers. The institutional interest in bringing traditional assets on ONSAIN is enormous, with the assessment of the distinguished assets market to reach 16 trillion dollars By 2030, to participate with confidence in Defi, institutions need the opposite parties that are compatible with organizational requirements. The entry of traditional institutional players to Defi to some defenders of privacy indicated that it can Confronting the essence of decentralizationWhich is the basis for the ecosystem. recently: Customize to bring the Buidl Tokeenized box to Defi with Redstone PRICE FEEDS Institutions must be able to trust the Defi platforms to maintain compliance criteria while providing a safe and smooth user interface. The balanced approach is the key. DEFI can be achieved without permission while maintaining compliance with identity profiles, allowing safe transactions. Likewise, the tools for examining transactions are facilitated in actual time and risk assessment. Blockchain analysis tools help institutions maintain compliance with anti -washing regulations and prevent interaction with the portfolios listed in the blacklist. Incorporation of these tools can help discover and prevent illegal activity, making Defi more secure for institutional participation. The relationship between architecture based on intent and security is clear; The same design is designed to reduce risk, creating a more reliable user experience. This protects the user from the MEV exploits, a common issue of wiping automatic robots for large profitable trading that can be exploited. The architecture based also helps the intent to implement compliance frameworks. For example, restricting applications to clean the governor and allow analysts to settle only acceptable requests. It is well understood that in the traditional Defi transactions, users often depend on brokers such as liquidity providers to implement professions or money management. This leads to the risks of the opposite party, unauthorized implementation and the failure of the settlement. The purpose -based architecture supports an unreliable settlement that guarantees users only when fulfilling all conditions, which reduces risks and removes blind confidence from the image. Defi reactions and UX are simplified for institutional investors. This system blocks the gap between. By implementing Offchain with security guarantee, it makes the intended architecture more secure and more efficient. However, one of the challenges it faces includes integrating the identification orders match while maintaining the transparency of Onchain. For the first adoption of Defi, there is a competitive advantage in the advantages of access to liquidity and the benefits of return, while the late adopters will face more barriers for audit and organizational. By 2026, the founders who have failed to adopt Defi may fight to keep up with it. This appears in examples of the first adopters such as Jpmorgan and Citi early Distinguished symbol Projects. Tradfi leaders are already preparing to fund ONChain. Organizational bodies, supervisory agencies and policy leaders must provide clear unified guidelines to facilitate the broader institutional participation. Unified protocols support broader institutional participation. Defi platforms must be prepared in advance to provide all the columns needed for compliance and security for institutional players who want to adopt the prevailing adoption. The implementation of this joint efforts must require organizers, developers and institutions. Opinion: Sergej Kunz, co -founder of 1inch. This article is for the purposes of general information, and it is not intended to be and should not be considered legal or investment advice. The opinions, ideas and opinions expressed here are alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
Build it properly, and they will come
Architecture based on intent can improve security
Defi's late adopters will face to keep up with this
The road forward
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.