Mordinals, also known as money ordinal, serves as a means of recording data along with transactions stored on the Monero blockchain. This unique feature allows users to include additional information within the Monero network, enhancing its capabilities beyond simple storage of transaction data.
The Ordinals concept was introduced to simplify the issuance of tokens and NFTs on the Bitcoin network. Over the past 30 days, Bitcoin arrangements have gained a lot of popularity in the cryptocurrency sector.
However, this newfound popularity had negative consequences, as it led to a significant increase in average transaction fees on the Bitcoin network. The introduction of the Ordinals concept on the Monero blockchain network has received mixed reactions.
While a few individuals appreciated the new use case for Monero, the majority of Monero supporters expressed strong opposition, citing potential threats to user privacy.
According to many of these proponents, Ordinals represent a central concept.
Furthermore, they expressed concerns that if Ordinals were implemented at scale on the Monero blockchain, it could pose a significant privacy risk for individuals who rely on Monero’s anonymizing features to remain anonymous within the network.
Are the concerns raised within the Monero community justified?
The criticisms leveled at Mordinals bear a striking resemblance to those faced by its Bitcoin counterpart, with an added focus on the potential implications of its privacy features. To protect user privacy, Monero transactions use “ring signatures,” which combine a transaction with a set of spoofed transactions.
However, a potential threat arises if an attacker with sufficient resources floods blocks with Mordinals. In such a scenario, it would be easy to distinguish legitimate transactions from fake NFTs, which is a real concern for users’ privacy.
The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) offered a large bounty in 2020 to motivate efforts to track Monero transactions, indicating there is a demand for such investigations. This fact highlights that there is a market for targeting Monero’s privacy features.
Possible implications for decentralization
The other dominant criticism surrounding the El Madinal is its potential ramifications for decentralization. As block sizes expand, so do the storage requirements placed on nodes. Thus, smaller nodes may be discouraged from staying online due to increased resource requirements.
While it is possible to upgrade the protocol to enable nodes to prune such transactions, it is important to consider the implications.
Blockchain networks rely on consensus among nodes regarding the state of the network. Liquidating blocks or specific transactions can be interpreted as a form of censorship, which may undermine the basic principles of decentralization.
Unlike Bitcoin, Monero has a dynamic block size, and the notion that Mordinals might cause the blockchain to expand abnormally is a legitimate concern in the community. but, seek In on-chain scales, blocks don’t seem to grow any faster.
Also, while Mordinals’ impact on privacy should not be underestimated, some argue that the risks can be fixed through updates.
Featured image from UnSplash, charts from TradingView.com
