in mail On X, the technology businessman and host of Bodcast Jason Calcannis has been criticized in Michael Sailor's aggressive strategy for Bitcoin. According to Calacanis, “Pumping Sailor is unabated for Bitcoin, and high -risk accumulation technologies, destroying the ecosystem and brand. Many centralization, a lot of exaggeration and a lot of conflicts. It actually defines an ideal opportunity for someone to launch” Bitcoin Better “. I don't know how it looks, but he put the theater completely.”
These notes come in the aftermath of Saylor's keynote speech at the Bitcoin for Americana event, organized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, where American Senate Sinmis announced its intention to re -submit the proposed Bitcoin Law. Under this legislation, the United States government will buy a million BTC for five years.
The timing also coincides with the Silor advertisement, the strategy (which was previously Micrudeji) will continue to buy huge amounts of BTC, although it already has approximately 500000 BTC. Earlier this week, Silor revealed that the strategy will collect additional capital by offering stock shares (ATM) of up to $ 21 billion in favorite stocks, to a large extent to continue its ceramic practice of collecting more bitcoin.
Does Silor harm bitcoin?
BTC's enthusiastic invitation to BTC has pushed BTC's investments to BTC. However, Claacanis worries that this heavy focus of BTC is in the hands of one entity – and the surrounding discourse – may threaten decentralized bitcoin spirit and open a way for alternatives.
However, veteran Bitcoiner and Vice President at Riot Platforms, Inc. , Pierre Rohard, refute Calacanis's allegations in a large -scale post on X. argue that the basic BTC structure protects it by nature from driving by any one influential personality – it does not matter the amount of BTC that this individual may accumulate.
Rochard emphasized the flexibility of BTC and decentralization, saying: “Bitcoin design is decentralized, with the mechanism of proving work and a globally distributed network of knot operators. Regardless of the volume of BTC per capita, they cannot adjust the rules of consensus or knots and workers’ work from one side to accept any changes to the protocol. “
He added that this “architecture based on rules means that the security of the system depends on an open source transparent protocol, which liberates any person to examine and operate. Even prominent defender or one senior holder is subject to the same verification and consensus as all other users.”
Then he turned to what the real sources of the BTC power see, focusing on the expected version of technology, encryption security, and deep inherent society: “While a prominent person like Michael Silor can attract attention and bring more capital in the market, the bitcoin value proposal does not depend on one speaker. Instead, it flows from the basic characteristics such as the expected version schedule, global access, and encryption security , A strong community of decentralized knots.
Treating the risks that adult holders may distort or undermine the ecosystem, Rohard highlighted the previous BTC flexibility in the face of various crises-which range from the collapse of the main exchange to thin chocolate over the years, Bitcoin has withstood the collapse of the main exchange, market fluctuation, and protocol disputes, with the survival of the Internet with no time to break. “
Ruchard stressed that the distribution of BTC is “the main headlines” that refer to the “main headlines”, adding, “The ownership itself does not give control of the rules of consensus, and that the audience's ability to coins for self -fraud means that they can penetrate from any guardian entity or smartly, for example.”
He also rejected the idea that the alternative cryptocurrency can replace BTC easily: “The idea of creating” Bitcoin Better “by overcoming the symbol or inventing a new cryptocurrency is a theory, but it is in practice. Safe.
Rochard's statement reinforced the BTC nature without permission and the principle that the network's participants are working on open source rules. He stressed that incidents that raise doubts often stimulate the increasing societal efforts on the subjective need and independent verification:
“Any scrutiny ultimately enhances an independent spirit of verification in the heart of BTC. MAXIM has risen, not your keys, not Bitcoin” directs users to reduce dependence on central platforms and custody services, enhance a strong education culture in devices portfolios, operate the knot, and best practices for a person's special keys. “
Ultimately, he concluded that BTC's governance lies in its law and a global community dedicated to the promotions that were reviewed by the counterparts and the integration of the protocol: “In this light, the bitcoin flexibility is long -term and centers is based on the principle that anyone can participate and verify Ledger according to open rules. The code and the global community remain to impose. , Without permission, and can be verified by anyone – is due to the fact that the basic bitcoin promise is not at risk. “
At the time of the press, BTC was traded at $ 82,404.
Distinctive image from YouTube, Chart from TradingView.com
Editing process For Bitcoinist, it is focused on providing accurate, accurate and non -biased content. We support strict resource standards, and each page is subject to a diligent review by our team of senior technology experts and experienced editors. This process guarantees the integrity of our content, importance and value of our readers.
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.